New Mexico's attorney general has filed a civil lawsuit against the long-time attorney and accountant of the late Jeffrey Epstein, seeking to block them from receiving further payments from his multi-million-dollar estate. The legal action alleges that these advisers played a critical role in financing and concealing illegal activities at the financier's New Mexico property.
On Wednesday, October 21, 2026, New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez initiated a significant civil lawsuit against Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, the two primary executors of the estate of the late Jeffrey Epstein. The legal filing seeks to prevent these individuals from accessing or receiving further distributions from the estate, which is estimated to hold assets exceeding $100 million. The state's move is a direct attempt to redirect these funds toward the survivors of the abuse that allegedly occurred at Epstein's Zorro Ranch.
The lawsuit alleges that Indyke, who served as Epstein’s personal attorney for approximately two decades, and Kahn, his long-time accountant, were not merely passive administrators of his wealth. Instead, the complaint accuses them of actively facilitating and concealing the sex trafficking operations that took place at the financier's New Mexico residence. Prosecutors argue that the financial infrastructure managed by these two men was essential to sustaining the illegal activities that occurred on the property.
For investors and observers of estate law, this case highlights the complexities of managing assets tied to criminal enterprises. Reports indicate that under the terms of Epstein’s will, Indyke was designated to receive $50 million, while Kahn was set to receive $25 million. Furthermore, public records suggest that both men received significant compensation from Epstein during his lifetime, with millions of dollars in payments documented between 2011 and 2019. The current lawsuit aims to claw back or freeze these remaining assets, arguing that they are the proceeds of a criminal network.
This civil action is part of a wider, ongoing effort by New Mexico authorities to hold those associated with Epstein accountable. The attorney general has previously expressed frustration regarding the level of cooperation from federal entities, including the Department of Justice, in investigating activities at the Zorro Ranch. As the estate remains under federal scrutiny, the outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for how assets linked to illicit operations are handled in probate and civil litigation.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the legal and reputational risks inherent in managing the finances of high-net-worth individuals involved in criminal activity. For the financial services industry, it underscores the importance of rigorous compliance and the potential for personal liability when professional services are used to facilitate illegal conduct. Ultimately, the case highlights the ongoing legal battle to ensure that assets derived from criminal enterprises are diverted to victims rather than those who enabled the perpetrators.